In meinem vorhergehenden Post habe ich ja schon kurz von unserer Woche in Edmonton für den Kurs "Evangelism" berichtet. Eine unserer Aufgaben dafür war, eine Reflexion und eine Kritik für das begleitende Buch "Lifestyle Evangelism" von Joe Aldrich zu schreiben, die ich hier mit euch teilen möchte.
Reflection on the Evangelism Week in Edmonton,
September 17-22, 2017
I.
Expectations
My feelings going into
this week of evangelism in Edmonton were mixed, since it was my first time intentionally
evangelising. I had shared my faith before, with friends and colleagues in
Germany as well as some of my hosts while I was traveling in the eastern
provinces of Canada this year, but had never talked to anybody I didn’t know
with the intention of telling that person about the gospel. I always
associated evangelism with talking to random strangers somewhat awkwardly
about Jesus. Therefore, I was somewhat apprehensive of being asked to approach
people in a way that would feel pushy and uncomfortable to me. I went to
Edmonton expecting to be stretched and pushed out of my comfort zone, which
made me a little nervous and at the same time excited about how it would be,
since I know that overstepping our limits gives God the opportunity to work.
II.
Experience
I was relieved on the
first day, when we were told that our task for that day would be to simply
start conversations with people at the Millwoods Mall. On that day at the
mall, Emily and I spoke to three people. The first was Glory, a Jehova’s
Witness and then an elderly Christian couple. Before we went into the mall we
took the time to pray to insure that we would not evangelise by relying on our
own understanding and agenda.
I do not
know much about Jehova’s witnesses and it was my first conversation with a Jehova’s
Witness. I only knew that they are very well trained in Scripture and try to
convert people, too, which is why I tried to keep the conversation more in the
area of personal experience. We had a good conversation, simply talking about
our lives and faith. Even though Glory seemed cautious, I had the impression
that some of the things Emily and I said or the way we said them reached her,
even though she often just countered with bible verses. She did not allow us
to pray for her while she was present, but did not mind our praying for her
after she had left. Upon our asking if she had prayer requests, she told us she hoped her children would also find the truth. Speaking
with Glory gave me a new perspective on door-to-door evangelism. When Emily
asked her when and how she had become a Jehova’s Witness, she said that people
had come to her door. This made me realize that this field would be completely
left to Jehova’s Witnesses if Christians do not go door-to-door, too.
The next
conversation we had with Hilda and Rudi, the Christian couple, was so
enjoyable that I even felt a little guilty for having it, which reveals
another misconception I had about evangelism. Unknowingly, I had approached
Germans, who had immigrated to Canada about 60 years ago. We encouraged them,
prayed for them and were encouraged in return. Hilda felt we had been sent her
way and said that God always sent her people when she felt discouraged. It is
incredible what we miss by always only passing by people, following our agenda
instead of God’s. Time passed very quickly and when the time came to meet with
the rest of the group at the van, I would have preferred to stay and continue
to talk to people because I enjoyed it so much. This first day – to my own
surprise – really encouraged and motivated me for this type of evangelism. In
the morning I had been struggling with some doubts and questions, a headache
and nausea, which made me question whether I would even be able to go out in
the afternoon. Other students in the group reported similar difficulties and
spiritual attacks during the week.
On the
second day at the mall, Emily and I talked to six people. Most other student groups
later expressed having experienced greater difficulty and spiritual opposition,
which we did not encounter. I found myself using the Evangecube, that we had been given that day. I had not been
planning to use it, since its design does not really appeal to me and the
gospel presentation given for the respective scenes – especially the “heaven
or hell” one – was not presented in the way I would present it. Furthermore, I
did not believe I would even get to sharing the gospel in one of the
conversations. However, when I started talking to Houdda, a Muslim woman from
Sudan, we came to the point where I could explain to her what Christians
believe about Jesus, which I did with the Evangecube.
In this setting, the Evangecube
proved to be an effective tool, since it illustrates the message of the Gospel and gives
structure to the presentation.
On
Thursday he went into some residential areas to distribute door hanger
invitations for a screening of the movie “The Case for Christ” at the church
we were staying at. I did not talk to many people but could invite a few
people personally on their doorstep. While I walked through the streets and
put the hangers on the doors I started praying for the people in the houses, the
neighbourhood and community. The meeting point was at the school, where a fire
alarm started shortly after we arrived, which gave me the opportunity to talk
to one of the teachers and invite her with the last invitation that I had put
into my pocket because the hanger was torn.
III. Conclusion
The week of learning
about and practicing evangelism in Edmonton in combination with the reading of
the book “Lifestyle Evangelism” by Joe Aldrich has given me a new perspective
on evangelism and inspired me to start the cultivation of evangelism as a way
of living.
Starting
with a more critical view of evangelism, the course taught me its importance
and its different forms and tools. In his book “Lifestyle Evangelism”, Joe
Aldrich names three categories of evangelism that are at the same time
different stages of evangelism as well as equally coexistent forms (Aldrich
1993, 73; 76). I always thought the only form of evangelism I would be willing
to do was the incarnational/relational type, which – according to Joe Aldrich
and also to my own impression – is the most natural and effective type,
because it allows time for the process of “cultivating, sowing and reaping”
(Aldrich 1993, 77). However, during this week, I realized that I am also
comfortable with the confrontational/intrusional type as long as I can be
sensitive to the situation and do not feel the urge to be the reaper when the
soil has never even been cultivated. Since we collaborate with God and fellow
believers in this process, our role may vary and we can trust God to work with
the input we were able to give (cf. Aldrich 1993, 77). In all of this, it is
very important and both our teacher and the author of the book stressed, that
“Evangelism is not something we do for Christ; it is something he does through
us” (Aldrich 1993, 114).
Another
aspect that was important for me to learn is that “evangelism involves both
good works and good words” (Aldrich 1993, 78). I have always preferred to only
preach by example and works without speaking about my faith, justifying this
with the quote (probably falsely) attributed to St. Francis of Assisi that we
should preach the
gospel at all times and when necessary, use words, which actually does not even contradict what I have
learned about evangelism now. Only that it is always necessary to use words at a certain point: “No one is good
enough to let just his life speak for Christ. Words are necessary to point beyond
himself to Christ.” (Aldrich 1993, 79). Furthermore, I learned that evangelism
and spiritual warfare of any kind always comes with opposition, which is a
sign of its impact and effectiveness. We faced and overcame this opposition as
a group in fellowship and prayer.
I really
appreciate that we were not given a certain number of people we had to talk to
in a certain amount of time because it allowed us to follow our impressions of
whom to talk to and take time for the people we met without looking at the
watch or looking for the next person to talk to, while still talking with
another. I liked the fact that the evangelism week was early in the semester
because this gave us an early insight into the practical implications and
importance of what we learn and why the spiritual disciplines – e.g.
memorization of Scripture – are important. In terms of our effectiveness and
confidence as evangelists, it might however be even more beneficial to have
the evangelism course and practice in the second or even higher semester, when
everyone has established a more secure basis and foundation of both knowledge
(e.g. Scripture memorized) and faith. Concluding the course on evangelism was
very instructive and beneficial for me on a personal and spiritual as well as
on an informative level.
Critique of “Lifestyle Evangelism” by Joe Aldrich
I.
Summary
In his book Lifestyle Evangelism Joe Aldrich
explores both the theoretical as well as the practical implications of a lifestyle
of evangelism. Dividing his work into three parts, he moves from defining what
evangelism should look like according to the Bible (Part 1) to the
step-by-step description and illustration of how this goal can be attained in
the church (Part 2) and in every believer’s life (Part 3). First of all it is
very important to state that “evangelism is what Jesus Christ is doing through
his church [and the individual believer] to reach his world” (Aldrich 1993,
155), not what we do for Christ (cf. Aldrich 1993, 114). On this basis,
Aldrich describes evangelism as the “glorious result” of a Christian community
that cultivates and communicates joy, certainty, completeness and beauty
(Aldrich 1993, 21) as such a healthy community then sends out into the world believers,
who live “as children of light” (Aldrich 1993, 32), making Christ’s love
tangible and proclaiming the Gospel. He stresses more than once the importance
of “both good works and good words” (e.g. Aldrich 1993, 78). Taking an
integrated stand, and presenting three different legitimate categories of
evangelism – 1) proclamational, 2) confrontational/intrusional, 3)
incarnational/relation (Aldrich 1993, 73) – Aldrich promotes the
incarnational/relational approach, since it is the most natural and effective
type according to his experience, because it allows time for the healthy
growth of relationships that enable the gradual process of cultivating, sowing
and reaping (cf. Aldrich 1993, 77).
In the
beginning of the book, Aldrich states that the foundation is Christ’s love,
the product of which is “holiness and blamelessness” (Aldrich 1993, 26). A
person who is “whole, integrated [and] balanced” (Aldrich 1993, 27) through
salvation and the love of Christ will live “beautifully [...] opening [his/her]
web of relationships to include the nonbeliever” (Aldrich 1993, 27).
II.
Strengths
Drawing from a wealth of
knowledge of both the Bible and the world as well as from a lifetime of
experience in evangelism, Aldrich has written a valuable guidebook to
evangelism for the Christian community. Numerous examples and illustrations
help the reader understand the topic and its implications. His step-by-step
practical explanations facilitate the implementation into the everyday life
and his figurative language (e.g. “music of the gospel”, “beautiful bride”;
Aldrich 1993, 20; 36) appeals not only to the head but also to the heart of
his readers. He often starts his chapters with anecdotes that introduce the
new subject in a very comprehensible way. The book does however not lack seriousness
and soundness. Aldrich confronts misconceptions and malpractices in a direct
but graceful manner and illustrates how improvement can be achieved. He also
challenges his readers and actively involves them by including lists (e.g. p.
40f) and an appendix with a 12 session study guide. Throughout the book,
Aldrich achieves to stress, what Whitney sometimes fails to emphasize: Everything
we do as Christians – be it evangelism or the practice of spiritual
disciplines – is meant to be “the constant and spontaneous outflow of our
individual and corporate experience of Christ” and his love for his beautiful
bride (Aldrich 1993, 29). Aldrich emphasizes that we have “the privilege of
delivering the best news that any individual could possibly receive”, which
should result in evangelism being “one of life’s most fulfilling and sought
after experiences” (Aldrich 1993, 191).
III. Weaknesses
In comparison to its
strength, the weaknesses of the book are almost negligible. For the standard
reader not involved in pastoral ministry or in a leadership position in
church, the second part of the book is not as relevant. I believe that the
topic of the second part is important and helpful to understanding the
pastor’s standing, position and function in the church but might have been
addressed more concisely in this book, since it does not apply to everyone. To
my view, Part 1 and 3 are more important and applicable for the average
Christian reader.
Personally, I did not like the analogy between the
Gospel and rifles in Chapter 7. Even though the Gospel is compared to a sword
in the Bible, I would have preferred a different comparison for quality
assurance and control (cf. Aldrich 1993, 131). I felt that equating the good
news with a company producing weapons was somewhat unsuitable.
A third minor drawback is his focus on men in the second
part of the book where he only talks about men and the male “model leader”
(Aldrich 1993, 137). Having a ministry for men in every church certainly is of
high importance but so is a healthy women’s ministry and the cultivation of
feminine leadership.
IV. Personal impact
We are called to live a
radical life (cf. Aldrich 1993, 39). The radicalness of our life should be
love just as it was in Jesus’ life. Reading the book “Lifestyle Evangelism”
made me realize in what way I am “important to the process” of God “draw[ing]
people to himself” (Aldrich 1993, 198) and how I can get involved in that
process.
Three aspects stood out to me in particular. Firstly: My
preference for incarnational/ relational evangelism is a shared feeling and
valid: “Natural evangelism provides the most satisfying option for the largest
number of believers” (Aldrich 1993, 191). Aldrich states that relating “is
much more natural [...], less stressful” and also “much more effective in the
long run”.
Secondly, the book – as well as the teaching in Edmonton – challenged me in my opinion about the importance of words vs. works. Tending towards the incarnational type of evangelism, I had hoped to be able to mostly avoid speaking about the gospel. Aldrich’s repeated comments on evangelism involving both “visualization and verbalization of truth” (Aldrich 1993, 31) – or put more simply “good words and good works” (Aldrich 1993, 78) – made me realize the importance and necessity of talking about the Gospel and how works and words always need to work together, both speaking the same language of beauty and love.
Secondly, the book – as well as the teaching in Edmonton – challenged me in my opinion about the importance of words vs. works. Tending towards the incarnational type of evangelism, I had hoped to be able to mostly avoid speaking about the gospel. Aldrich’s repeated comments on evangelism involving both “visualization and verbalization of truth” (Aldrich 1993, 31) – or put more simply “good words and good works” (Aldrich 1993, 78) – made me realize the importance and necessity of talking about the Gospel and how works and words always need to work together, both speaking the same language of beauty and love.
Thirdly,
his comment “If you do nothing more than eliminate [the] caricature [that
Christianity is a religion], you will have made great progress.” (Aldrich
1993, 188) made me see the effectiveness of my evangelism this year and
realize its value. Working and living on organic farms I was literally and
metaphorically in the harvest field. I cultivated and sowed in both senses.
The book now has also given me the tools to reap.
The main
goal in evangelism is to become more and more like Jesus. Being an effective
evangelist is a side-effect that follows: “The Christian loves his neighbour
and evangelism becomes a byproduct of his self-giving love, not the reason for
it” (Aldrich 1993, 76). Reading the book “Lifestyle Evangelism” in combination
with the week of learning about and practicing evangelism in Edmonton has
given me a new perspective on evangelism and inspired me to start the
cultivation of evangelism as a way of living.
V.
Summary
“Lifestyle Evangelism” is
both an enjoyable read and a valuable resource. With its combined theoretical
and practical approach it is a recommendable guidebook that I would advise
every Christian toread and start to apply in his daily life.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen